Yeah, I know. We seem to be pretty much in disagreement, experientially and philosophically straight up and down the line when it comes to topics hand-gun related. You're an absolutist, and I'm a pragmatist. You're all about the way, while I adhere to a way. In the end, we will agree upon very little. With all that said, I do find these discussions with you beneficial in that they bring many things in for closer examination.Sorry MIke, I Totally disagree. Let's start with your statement on QuickKill, it is an instinctive sighting technique, target focused and gun indexed.. You are not using sights. That makes it point shooting, index shooting, When you confuse a position, and that is what you did with Quarter, half and three quarter (they are point shooting positions) not sighting or gun alignment. You say you are not using the same index at different distance and then come back and say you index the muzzle the same at 5 yrds as you do at 80 yrds. I am not sure you understand what you are claiming.
Hitting a target at any distance is the muzzle alignment to the target. To hit a target, the muzzle has to have the same alignment to hit target, regardless of the type of sight alignment or gun index you use.
There are no other methods of aiming other than Index (point shooting), Flash sight (focusing on target and firing when the ft sight is somewhere on the target, not aligned), and then aimed fire ( sights alignment tied into sight picture).
There are only so many ways to sight and shoot a gun. Nothing new in over 100 yrs.