Florida Concealed Carry banner

41 - 50 of 50 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
903 Posts
My 4" barrel Colt Python, made in 1981.



But here is a more interesting (though a lot less valuable) revolver. It's called a "Couger". Below the photos is some history for anyone who gives a damn. <img src="http://www.floridaconcealedcarry.com/Forum/images/smilies/grinning.gif" border="0" alt="" title="Big Grin" class="inlineimg" />



Collectible, though not particularly valuable. It's a Ruger Security Six married to a Colt Python barrel. Hence, the "Co" from Colt and "uger" from Ruger gives you "Couger".

The Couger was not produced as a novelty. They were purpose built and required a lot of time and effort to assemble since the threads on a Colt Python barrel and the threads in both Ruger and Smith frames are different. The Couger was built for high performance PPC shooting.

More popular than the Couger was the Smolt (Or Smython). A Smith & Wesson frame married to a Python barrel. ("Sm" from Smith & Wesson and "olt" from Colt (or "ytoon" from Python).

These "conversions" were popular in the 70's and 80's as PPC competition guns. And, as important as the barrel change was the action work performed by the well known gunsmiths that were noted for producing them.

The Colt Python barrel was reputed to be the most accurate production barrel of it’s day because of its higher quality rifling and tighter tolerances. It was also .001 smaller at the muzzle and the twist rate of 1:14 was more aggressive than both Ruger’s 1:18.75 and the Smith & Wesson. More spin was generated thus resulting in greater accuracy. Particularly with the slower wadcutters of that era that were generally used In competition.

The heaver barrel with full under lug was another advantage providing good forward balance. The Python barrel’s vent rib was claimed to provide a better sighting plane. And, the Python forcing cone was alleged to be stronger and more durable allowing more rounds before accuracy degraded.

So, why the Ruger and Smith & Wesson frames? Because it was, (and is) widely known that the Colt Python lock-work and timing did not stand up as well under the heavy use of and high volume of rounds common in PPC competition guns. Ruger’s and Smith’s were accepted as stronger, more durable thus the combination provided the best of both worlds. So, from this the Couger (“Co” from Colt and “uger” from Ruger) Smolt (or Smyton) were born.
If I have not said so before, welcome to the board. Love your threads and pics. You are rapidly becoming the smut king of revolver porn around here.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,842 Posts
Discussion Starter #42
That Python is beautiful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
162 Posts
I have two Dan Wesson revolvers, a stainless 357 magnum and a blued 44 magnum. However, since I have an extra barrel for each, it's like I have four. I have a 4" and 6" for the 357 and a 6" and 8" for the 44.

Garry
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,539 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,842 Posts
Discussion Starter #45
Love the DW revolvers, I missed out on purchasing one a few years back. One day I shall own one!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,662 Posts
Baahhh.....would not own A revolver.....they don't shoot very good...but I might have more than A revolver....and they shoot excellant
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,662 Posts
This is the one that a lot of people have shot at Brownies and my classes.....
 

Attachments

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
26,344 Posts
^^^^
That's some of my favorite gun porn right there, EBL! :bowdown
 
41 - 50 of 50 Posts
Top