Thanks for posting this question, Franklin! I carry 185 grain +P Federal Hydra-Shok in both of my .45s and wonder (worry about) the same. It would be great if someone could point us to real-world data.
Thanks for posting this question, Franklin! I carry 185 grain +P Federal Hydra-Shok in both of my .45s and wonder (worry about) the same. It would be great if someone could point us to real-world data.Should we be concerned with over penetration ...
Franklin
Good info hereThanks for posting this question, Franklin! I carry 185 grain +P Federal Hydra-Shok in both of my .45s and wonder (worry about) the same. It would be great if someone could point us to real-world data.
Brownie,http://www.threatfocused.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2213
These results were from a 5" and then 4" barrel. I only listed the 185 or lighter loadings tested, there is a lot of data in the link for your review.
Brownie
Sorry about that, I did not see his request for lighter loads.No sir, in fact I prefer the heavier bullets in most calibers with the right loads.
230 Ranger T 45's; 147 Ranger T 9mm's are my preference [ standard velocity in both ].
There are plenty of loads in 230grain at were tested on that link: http://www.threatfocused.com/forums/showthread.php?t=2213
The OP asked for the lighter load data, that's all I provided initially.
Brownie
If you decide to throw it out, let me know :drinksSorry about that, I did not see his request for lighter loads.
Here I thought I was going to have to throw out all of my Federal 230 grain Hydra-Shok Jacketed Hollow Point Ammo .... not!!![]()
Sir, I have heard about the size of your ammo stash ... mine would only be a drop in the bucket compared to it!If you decide to throw it out, let me know :drinks
Brownie