[racer88]

It occurs to me that the branded name of this technique could certainly raise eyebrows. Most of have heard the legal advice to NOT use the phrase, "shoot to kill." If we are in a situation where our lives or grave bodily harm are at stake, then we may use (lethal) force to STOP the attack. We "shoot to stop."

How might it play in court, if you are defending yourself legally but you have been identified as someone who learned and practices "Quick Kill ®" technique?

If I dare....

I think "Quick Stop" would be "legally safer" as a publicized and learned self-defense technique.

Alternatively, "El-Stoppo-el-attacko." 🤪

Give me a sec to don my asbestos suit!

 

[racer88]

OOoops,. too late for you, you've been given the QK pistol. You better stop carrying altogether, you could be questioned about what skill you used because you've been trained in it.

Have we met?

 

[racer88]

We've covered this ground before here and elsewhere, you're entitled to your opinion. OOoops,. too late for you, you've been given the QK pistol. You better stop carrying altogether, you could be questioned about what skill you used because you've been trained in it. They'll be able to access your internet presence, you're F*d now apparently

Quick Kill?!?? I thought he said "Quick Gill," so I showed up with my fishing rod ready to learn how to kick bass!