Florida Concealed Carry banner

1 - 16 of 16 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,563 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/02/06/breaking-summary-leaked-atf-white-paper-analysis-nfa-free-suppressors-shouldered-braces-armor-piercing-ammo-oh/

Consider reclassifying silencers as non-NFA items, revising the definition of “silencer”.

The ATF seems to enjoy a lot of latitude in it's rulemaking process. Outside of the EPA, I can't think of any other agency besides the ATF whose rules and recommendations are tantamount to law.

The Deputy ATF director is suggesting silencers become non-NFA items, as we know. Could the ATF issue a ruling or just stop enforcing the NFA on silencers and make them de factoTitle I arms?

Or is the only route the HPA?
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
19,788 Posts
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2017/02/06/breaking-summary-leaked-atf-white-paper-analysis-nfa-free-suppressors-shouldered-braces-armor-piercing-ammo-oh/




The ATF seems to enjoy a lot of latitude in it's rulemaking process. Outside of the EPA, I can't think of any other agency besides the ATF whose rules and recommendations are tantamount to law.

The Deputy ATF director is suggesting silencers become non-NFA items, as we know. Could the ATF issue a ruling or just stop enforcing the NFA on silencers and make them de factoTitle I arms?

Or is the only route the HPA?
The ATF cannot, arbitrarily, remove "silencers" from the NFA. Nor can they decide which laws they will or wil not enforce.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
10,569 Posts
Reminds me of how the Brady Campaign lobbied and got the ATF to add the "Street Sweeper" to the destructive devices list at the behest of the Treasury Secretary (Bentson). Was not a law but the used and convinced the ATF that this shotgun "had no sporting value". Yet target practice is concidered a shooting sport. The Brady Campaign beat the dead horse until the Street Sweeper along with the USAS being over a 1" bore and of no "sporting use" could be added to Destructive Devices catergory with the ATF. If you ask me, the ATF needs to be abolished due to the fact that they can actually create policy that has the same effect as law. No government entity should be able to do this without a vote in Congress.

"The Striker and Streetsweeper were declared*destructive devices*under theNational Firearms Act*with no sporting purpose by Treasury Secretary*Lloyd Bentsen*in 1994 and their transfer and ownership is regulated by the*Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives*(ATF).[8]"
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
4,701 Posts
Who do they think they are, Loretta Lynch?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,095 Posts
Seems like with an arbitrary ruling, binary triggers, slam fire stocks, bump fire, etc. could all disappear in a heartbeat. :thumbsdwn
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
27,065 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,563 Posts
Discussion Starter #8
Seems like with an arbitrary ruling, binary triggers, slam fire stocks, bump fire, etc. could all disappear in a heartbeat. :thumbsdwn
That's what I'm saying. It seems they can make rulings which are tantamount to having the force of law.

However that being said, I'd rather suppressors come off the NFA via legislation than an ATF ruling. The ATF could rule suppressors are 'OK' as Title I firearms, and then when the next guy comes in, they could reverse course.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,116 Posts
Silencers can't come off because it is a law (the NFA) rather than a ruling. The law would have to be modified to remove them from the NFA.

I didn't wait. Got mine before 41F, Submitted at the end of June. They are currently approving form 4s submitted in late May.

I'm currently waiting to buy any others. With the current ATF backlog, I expect the HPA to go to a vote before a submitted form 4 gets approved.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
3,800 Posts
Haven't actually read that law. I wonder exactly how a "suppressor" is defined. If the definition is at all vague, could they interpret the definition in some alternate way so that many of the devices now available are no longer considered a "suppressor" under the law?

For example, in Florida an "ordinary pocket knife" is not considered a weapon. But that term is only very vaguely defined. So if the state's Attorney General decided that he is going to interpret "ordinary pocket knife" to be any knife, of any sort, that can be carried in a pocket... Voila! The law hasn't changed, but what can be carried around most certainly has.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,067 Posts
And then there are solvent traps
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,903 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
5,116 Posts
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a "solvent trap"?
They make threaded adapters that fit your barrel and a standard oil filter.

The oil filter acts as a suppressor if you shoot through one.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,067 Posts
Google is your friend.......
Basically a tube and some freeze plugs that a guy might "or might not" drill some holes in for a projectile to pass through

- - - Updated - - -

They make threaded adapters that fit your barrel and a standard oil filter.

The oil filter acts as a suppressor if you shoot through one.
Nooooo! That is a different pseudo suppressor
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
5,067 Posts
1 - 16 of 16 Posts
Top