because a minority is a protected class....concealed weapons license holders are not...
because a minority is a protected class....concealed weapons license holders are not...Question for the group: If a private business that is open to the public can refuse to allow anyone carrying concealed on to their property, what if they refused to allow minorities, or people from a political party they disagree with? That would be illegal. Why can they legally disallow someone just because they are exercising a constitutional right that they don't agree with? Why isn't exercising a constitutional right protected from discrimination?
Since the on-topic stuff has been covered I don't mind that much.As much as I hate to get this thread further off topic.... wouldn't it be great to get the ACLU suing FOR gun rights!:laughing:clap:rolf
if so the signs can be ignored, but then again who wants to be the test case?Did a little digging. The owner of the property according to the tax rolls is Maimi-Dade parks and rec. That makes it county land.
I'm not so sure Ruby. There's been some discussion in other threads about the premise that the government cannot convey a privilege that it, itself, does not have. In other words, If Dade County Parks & Rec owns the property, and Dade County Parks & Rec is prohibited by Florida Statute from exercising any authority over firearms, then they cannot legally convey that authority to a lessee.Even if it's county land, I believe the fair is leasing the land and so I believe they can make the rules during their time there. You can't be arrested for carrying concealed, but you can be arrested for trespassing if they ask you to leave and you don't.
Same thing here where gunshows are held in the exhibition hall at the county fairgrounds...with off-duty LEO sitting at the check-in counter...I just walk right past 'em, but I've always questioned the legality of it in the first place.I'm not so sure Ruby. There's been some discussion in other threads about the premise that the government cannot convey a privilege that it, itself, does not have. In other words, If Dade County Parks & Rec owns the property, and Dade County Parks & Rec is prohibited by Florida Statute from exercising any authority over firearms, then they cannot legally convey that authority to a lessee.
Problem is that to my knowledge, there is no case law to support the position. A similar, but not identical situation exists in Lee County, where the gun shows are held in a County civic center that clearly has "no firearms" signs posted at the entrances.
That tells me that there's still a lot of gray area as to how lawful / legal those signs are. However, it does not change how the authorities might react if they were to find out. Even if we assume the only way it comes to light is through lawful use of your firearm for self-defense...I'm not so sure Ruby. There's been some discussion in other threads about the premise that the government cannot convey a privilege that it, itself, does not have. In other words, If Dade County Parks & Rec owns the property, and Dade County Parks & Rec is prohibited by Florida Statute from exercising any authority over firearms, then they cannot legally convey that authority to a lessee.
Problem is that to my knowledge, there is no case law to support the position.
Well, I don't think there's any case law because no one has ever been ejected for that reason. But it's not gray area as far as how lawful or legal the signs are in general. Any sign that says no firearms at a location not prohibited by 790.06(12) FS can not legally apply to a CWFL holder. It merely expresses the wishes of the owner of the private property. The gray area begins when governmental entities believe they have all the privileges of private property owners. Case law, I believe, has not supported that position in the past, but I'm not aware of case law that addresses it with regards to firearms regulation.That tells me that there's still a lot of gray area as to how lawful / legal those signs are. However, it does not change how the authorities might react if they were to find out. Even if we assume the only way it comes to light is through lawful use of your firearm for self-defense...
Pending that type of scenario, is there something that you could be charged with for having the weapon there in the first place?
YES! Cops can and will charge you with whatever they think applies. You might be surprised to find out how little LEOs know regarding CC laws. One told me he just looks at a CCW and if it looks legit, he lets it go. He has no clue where we can and cannot carry. Cops don't care what happens to you after they drop you off at jail. It's up to a DA to decide to pursue the charges, and up to you to pay a lawyer to defend yourself. A buddy here at work got picked up and charged with a bunch of things because a cabbie saw his revolver. He's confident they will all be dropped, but it's costing a fortune I'm sure.Pending that type of scenario, is there something that you could be charged with for having the weapon there in the first place?
It's sort of ridiculous.YES! Cops can and will charge you with whatever they think applies. You might be surprised to find out how little LEOs know regarding CC laws. One told me he just looks at a CCW and if it looks legit, he lets it go. He has no clue where we can and cannot carry. Cops don't care what happens to you after they drop you off at jail. It's up to a DA to decide to pursue the charges, and up to you to pay a lawyer to defend yourself. A buddy here at work got picked up and charged with a bunch of things because a cabbie saw his revolver. He's confident they will all be dropped, but it's costing a fortune I'm sure.
Amazingly enough, they can't do that. Florida Statutes specifically require a request to leave and a refusal in order to be charged with trespass.It's sort of ridiculous.
It just seems to me as though the "Just leave the premises" might not be a valid response in some situations. They may wish to charge you immediately for criminal trespass before even asking you to leave.
been there done that, you get someone who sees your gun, calls in a man with a gun, a dozen cops come running, draw down on you, cart you off to jail, confiscate the gun and you get to spend some time in jail, hire an expensive lawyer, to prove that you've broken no laws. and to boot the DA/SA knows that there's no real case here and assigns their most incompetent and worst prosecutor to your case because nobody in the office wants a losing case, a year later, 6 court appearances, a ton of expense for the lawyer to appear 6 times just for the case to be dismissed because they've decided they've busted your horns enough and no crime was committedYES! Cops can and will charge you with whatever they think applies. You might be surprised to find out how little LEOs know regarding CC laws. One told me he just looks at a CCW and if it looks legit, he lets it go. He has no clue where we can and cannot carry. Cops don't care what happens to you after they drop you off at jail. It's up to a DA to decide to pursue the charges, and up to you to pay a lawyer to defend yourself. A buddy here at work got picked up and charged with a bunch of things because a cabbie saw his revolver. He's confident they will all be dropped, but it's costing a fortune I'm sure.
No its not and no they can't. We just went through this with various county and city parks and are in the process with some of the RWMDs. DO NOT risk an armed trespass charge if this occurs, comply, then call a lawyer. Local governments in Florida are subject to preemption of state law. They cannot perform arbitrary and capricious action. They must have an authorizing ordinance or administrative rule for any action. Any such ordinance or rule is illegal per 790.33.I keep seeing this subject raised on this forum. It's like any other private property. The owner can refuse admission to anyone. They can throw out anyone. If you refuse to go, they can have you trespassed. The AMC locally supposedly hires off duty LEO to keep an eye on things. I heard they will throw you out if you're caught with a concealed weapon.
Wow, a question in a thread that's been dormant for over six and a half years? Really? Your question probably would have been better placed in a more recent thread regarding the shenanigans in the latest legislative session on the latest Open Carry bills in the Florida House and Senate.Sorry for bringing up a thread long dead - however... next year it looks much brighter for Florida to get open carry passed.
That will surely push to the forefront and possibly bring to a head this long on-going issue of whether you can be excluded or ejected from public property used for public events if lawfully armed, just because the property may be leased by a private entity.
What will happen is some folks will conceal to get in, then later discreetly switch to open carry (if legalized). If they get kicked out, they will then have standing to sue. Hopefully, the courts will come down with the correct decision in favor of carry rights on public property.
The Florida Legislature actually should have fixed this long ago with clear language in the preemption statute. Has anyone ever written their lawmakers about this? If so, what was the response?