Florida Supreme Court sez a license = a right - Page 5
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: Florida Supreme Court sez a license = a right

  1. #41
    Super Moderator Rvrctyrngr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Gator Nation
    Posts
    19,580
    Quote Originally Posted by TitleIIToyLover View Post
    May God bless you and may God bless FC.
    Thanks...we need all the help we can get!

    Estimated $20k+ just to get to cert. Quite a price to put on a Constitutional 'redress of grievances', eh?
    Detached reflection cannot be demanded in the presence of an uplifted knife.
    -Justice Oliver Wendel Holmes
    Brown v. United States, 1921

    ...against ALL enemies, foreign AND domestic.

    Join Florida Carry

  2. #42
    Distinguished Member guns and more's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    2,447
    I don't get it.
    If a license = a right, then rights can be licensed.
    But I thought rights came from God, not government.
    A dangerous slope.

  3. #43
    Junior Member Racist Infidel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Ft. McCoy
    Posts
    4
    Well I had an interesting telephone conversation this afternoon with my new Representative McClain. I sat on the telephone for an hour with his aid on Monday. I pointed out the wording of "ARITICLE 1, SECTION 8, (a) The right of the people to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and of the lawful authority of the state shall not be infringed, except that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law." I then made it clear that I needed an answer as to where they have any authority to regulate the "where" of FS 790. We hung up and my phone rung 15 minutes later. "I found where they can regulate the manner of carrying..." and pointed out exactly what we had gone over before. I explained again that what he found did not give them power over "where." "Oh, I see."

    McClain called today. He agreed that beyond the "manner" of bearing arms, they have no Constitutional authority to regulate the "where" of firearms. So on face value he seems to understand the question. Now it will be interesting to see what he does.

  4. Remove Advertisements
    FloridaConcealedCarry.com
    Advertisements
     

  5. #44
    Distinguished Member TitleIIToyLover's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    East Central Florida
    Posts
    3,898
    Quote Originally Posted by Racist Infidel View Post
    Well I had an interesting telephone conversation this afternoon with my new Representative McClain. I sat on the telephone for an hour with his aid on Monday. I pointed out the wording of "ARITICLE 1, SECTION 8, (a) The right of the people to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves and of the lawful authority of the state shall not be infringed, except that the manner of bearing arms may be regulated by law." I then made it clear that I needed an answer as to where they have any authority to regulate the "where" of FS 790. We hung up and my phone rung 15 minutes later. "I found where they can regulate the manner of carrying..." and pointed out exactly what we had gone over before. I explained again that what he found did not give them power over "where." "Oh, I see."

    McClain called today. He agreed that beyond the "manner" of bearing arms, they have no Constitutional authority to regulate the "where" of firearms. So on face value he seems to understand the question. Now it will be interesting to see what he does.
    Hopefully you planted a seed. Let's see if gets enough sunshine to grow.
    There are only 3 colors, 10 digits, and 7 notes; it's how we arrange them that is important.

Sposors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •