Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Fishing with hand grenades...

  1. #1
    Senior Member FLACPA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Jacksonville, FL

    Fishing with hand grenades...

    I put this in the Humor section because we don't have a WTF!? section.

    Apparently Russia has rednecks too! I can't stop watching this.
    NRA Member
    USN 1989-1998
    Unforgiveness - The poison you drink hoping the other person will die.
    Osama bin Laden - World Hide-and-Go-Seek Champion (2001-2011)
    The world ain't what it seems....the moment you think you got it figured, you're wrong!" - Shooter

  2. #2
    Distinguished Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida
    That had to play he!! on that inflatable boat.

  3. #3
    Distinguished Member Brian75's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    That looks like the stunt scene from Expendables 2. The stunt man in the front is Kun Liu, he died from those injuries.
    If you walk out of your house carrying your gun and you DO NOT fully understand the law, then you are NOT completely armed.

    The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. McAlister v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 90, 26 S.Ct. 385, 50 L.Ed. 671; Commonwealth v. Shaw, 4 Cush. 594, 50 Am.Dec. 813; Orum v. State, 38 Ohio App. 171, 175 N.E. 876. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies as to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus. The holdings in the cases of this type cited by defendant are sound, but they do not apply here because Memolo did not resist, he acquiesced. Likewise, he did not have himself held in contempt or arrested for refusal. Furthermore, he had the documents in his possession and returned them. Finally, he did testify as to such matters many times before this grand jury and now expressly waives the privilege against self-incrimination as to this testimony.

    United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 539 (D. Pa. 1947)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Fort Walton Beach
    Must have let it cook then drop straight down, even our rednecks are smarter than that! Well, most of the time anyways.
    EDC: G21 or Kimber

    "You're not paranoid if they really are out to get you" (or your rights)
    Most posts are from iphone, excuse the spelling and typos

Remove Ads


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts