Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Ruger LCR vs S&W 642

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    493

    Ruger LCR vs S&W 642

    I was asked to do a range report comparison so here goes. I bought both of these guns the same day and shot them with the same White Box ammo along with some Winchester PDX1 .38 +P. First let me say that I like them both. The S&W has CT laser grips on it and therefore easier to carry in the pocket. The LCR has the stock overmolded Hogue grips which really absorb the recoil and feels good in the hand. Let's start with the recoil. I am not recoil sensitive and am always puzzled when people mention how hard snubbies are to shoot due to their recoil. If I have to choose I would say that the Ruger feels slightly softer but given the difference in grips that is no surprise. Sights - they both sucked. I cannot see black on black or gun metal on gun metal. The laser on the 642 was better than the metal sights on the LCR. Metal sight to sight without the laser, I did not notice any difference. Let's cut to the chase. The big difference for me was the trigger. After some practice I was easily able to stage the trigger so that just a little more pressure would make it go boom. It felt like a fairly light takeup and then some heavier resistance. I could get it right to the breaking point everytime during slow firing. During the test firing of the LCR, an older couple were practicing with the LCR and not doing so well. The husband came over to me and started watching and after awhile called over his wife to show her my results. She liked what she saw and then repeated the old story about snubbies being only arm's length belly guns and asked how far out could I shoot it accurately. Well, to tell the truth, I did not know as I normally practice at 7-10 yards with my carry guns (versus my competition guns) so I took the target out to 25 yards and carefully and slowly staged the trigger and put all five into an area the size of a head. They were very impressed as was I . After they left I tried the same with the 642 and only managed to put three on my normal head sized targets.

    So as far as which I shot better at long range it would have to be the LCR and I attribute that to the trigger. When I switched to the +P ammo there was perhaps a little more muzzle rise in both but other than that there was no brutal recoil that hurt the hand like I have read on several gun forum boards. The real test was giving both to my 100 lb, 4' 11" wife to dry fire. She could not easily pull the trigger of the 642 but had no problem with the LCR. Both carried in the pocket and IWB/OWB well. I tend to carry the LCR more due to its lighter weight and nicer feeling trigger (at least to me). I do not think you can go wrong with either but the LCR is less expensive, lighter, seems to handle recoil better and has a lighter feeling trigger so it would be a good choice for anyone. Lately my new toy, a .32 Seecamp comes with me most often. Terrible at more than 5 yards, no sights at all and a small round but it truly is a gun I can carry and forget about it. I mean forget about it to the point where you almost expose it because you really forgot you were carrying it. Not a revlover but enough to dissuade the type of BG I would encounter in my retirement community. Hey, I made it 59 years without a gun and I think I can make it a few more but just in case I like to always have a "get off me" gun to buy me time to get out of there.

  2. #2
    Distinguished Member milkmanjoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    BocaFl/SeabrookSC
    Posts
    7,929
    Thanks for sharing...........I have the LCR too, sometimes put it in my pocket as my back-up wallet....so, demand my wallet and I present you with a rapidly firing .38. Great gun, I have other revolvers, this little LCR is my favorite for general all around ease of use and carry.
    Memorial Day is every day for me

    I don't sleep, I wait

    As a younger man I subscribed to quick witted philosophical wording, yet as I age I realize I knew nothing about that wording, wisdom truly comes from variations in one's life over periods of time, not from mirroring someone else's thoughts or words..

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    13
    Thanks for your report. I have the S$W 642 with laser but I stick the Ruger LCP in my pocket more often. The 642 is great.

  4. #4
    Senior Member birdman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Murphy, NC & Southwest Florida
    Posts
    1,684
    Thanks for the report... I've fired both guns, but not side by side and only a few rounds out of the LCR at that. I'm curious though as to why you would prefer to carry the Seecamp .32 over the LCR aside from profile?

    On my Seecamp .32 the trigger is atrocious, it's heavier to carry, the "manual of arms" is odd/unique and the round is smaller. The only advantage I see to the Seecamp is it's smaller, easier to hide. Mine is a "safe-queen" and has been for many years.

    Allan
    NRA Certified Instructor
    Our Freedom is supported on 4 boxes,
    Ballot, Soap, Jury and Cartridge

  5. #5
    Member OldGator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Central FL
    Posts
    451
    Thanks for being so thorough in your report, Vinny. It gives me more options to discuss with Missus Gator if she begins showing interest.
    ~ CWFL, NRA, G19, Vietnam era Veteran, Grandpa ~

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by willyd View Post
    Thanks for your report. I have the S$W 642 with laser but I stick the Ruger LCP in my pocket more often. The 642 is great.
    Same here so I think I will buy a laser for the LCR now that it gets dark earlier.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by birdman View Post
    Thanks for the report... I've fired both guns, but not side by side and only a few rounds out of the LCR at that. I'm curious though as to why you would prefer to carry the Seecamp .32 over the LCR aside from profile?

    On my Seecamp .32 the trigger is atrocious, it's heavier to carry, the "manual of arms" is odd/unique and the round is smaller. The only advantage I see to the Seecamp is it's smaller, easier to hide. Mine is a "safe-queen" and has been for many years.

    Allan
    The weight does not bother me as I am 6', 265 lbs. I agree with everything you say but I live in a retirement community and mostly spend my time at the pool, movie theater or local restaurant. The Seecsmp is adequate for my routine needs. When I venture afar I take either my LCR or Glock 26. And for god's sake man, it is my new gun and I have to carry it until the novelty wears off.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    SW FL--Bradenton
    Posts
    346
    What holster do you find is best/most comfortable for the LCR?
    Like you, I am retired and in FL, so to keep the profile down while carry is the issue too.

    Shoot safely!

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    493
    Quote Originally Posted by adjohns3 View Post
    What holster do you find is best/most comfortable for the LCR?
    Like you, I am retired and in FL, so to keep the profile down while carry is the issue too.

    Shoot safely!
    My favorite is High Noon Mr. Softy. The one with the FBI cant. I keep buying those Mr. Softy holsters because they are so comfortable. Probably because they are so soft. Plus they are inexpensive and fit a lot of gun models since they are not form molded.

Sposors

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Search tags for this page

642 vs lcr

,
compare s&w lady smith with ruger lcr
,

lcr vs 642

,
ruger lcr 38 vs s&w 642
,
ruger lcr size comparison
,

ruger lcr vs s&w 642

,
ruger lcr vs smith and wesson 642
,
s w 642 vs ruger lcr
,
s&w 642 vs lcr
,

s&w 642 vs ruger lcr

,
size comparison s&w 642 and lcr
,
sw 642 or ruger lcr 38
Click on a term to search for related topics.