Search:

You should try some of the ones I've had in the past...does nothing for the pain, just makes you not give a crap about it!

You missed an "I" Scott: Article VIII, Section 5(b).

Federal Courthouse? Yes you would have been arrested.

Question - Why is the Social Security office on a Federal Courthouse?

Rich, do you have a link to that case? I'd be very interested.

http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/Sections/Documents/loaddoc.aspx?FileName=_h1355er.docx&DocumentType=Bill&BillNumber=1355&Session=2013

For a transaction with a private seller, no criminal history check required.

Of course all FFL's must complete an FDLE Firearms Purchase Program check on any transfers they make.

I doubt the courts would agree with them.

Yes. It prohibits any disciplinary action by your employer if you hold a Florida CWFL. Subject to those exceptions listed in sub-section 7.


State/local governments are also subject to it's...

Well, yes then 'public' actually owns it.

But do they have the "right" of access? No. They may have an implied invitation, but only the owners have the right of access.

Problem (as always) is the choice of words:
The Constitutional Revision Commission (a bunch of political appointees - which meets every 20 years) must use the same bill writers as the legislature!

Someone better tell Bob to do a better job than PBSO & ATF (or at least have better convincing lies):
PAMPHILE v. State, Fla: Dist. Court of Appeals, 4th Dist. 2013

Bingo!

I've dropped one of my Glocks, twice! Once unloaded, once loaded. The first one got me a DQ at a match. The second time I was in a hurry (stupid) it slid out of a POS holster I was using to...

It'll depend on the circumstances and numbers as to whether federal agents are arrested by state agents.[/QUOTE]

Firepower in this case actually means lawyers. All it will really take is a single...

What we are seeing is political posturing, period. None of these state legislature's actually believe these laws are legal/constitutional if they do they should be removed from office on grounds of...

Many of us have the opinion that it is legal. Some Universities disagree. Florida Carry's legal team is currently in litigation with one such school. So we will have to wait for verification.

Unless of course either entity 'deputizes' the LEO of the other, or operates in a joint task force, or other such legal agreement authorizing such action.

And clearly, obviously, unconstitutional...

According to an apparent eye witness:

No.
790.251 has nothing, at all, to do with the legality of possessing/carrying a firearm anywhere in the State. It simply prohibits employers from disciplining (terminating or other action)...

Was thinking perhaps that you had your own personal reticles made! :thumsup

My EOTech's have a 1 MOA dot and 65 MOA ring, I thought they all did?

Some of the previous posters in this thread would say so.

Well, I guess if you make up a statute, you can make it say whatever you want!

Well, if this property is legally under the charge and control of the VA, there are quite a few traffic regulations (there is no evidence to suggest this is the case - actually there is evidence to...

Other than the reference to a non-existent statute and the really crappy writing in the first paragraph, I'm not sure I see anything else. Except of course the misspelling of 'trespassing'. Also not...